From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: scm_* API extension? [was] scm_* API question Date: 31 Jul 2002 12:10:19 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020730121436.GA4465@www> <20020730200929.A18106@kiwi.pyrotechnics.com> <20020731100300.GC5661@www> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028110245 16520 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2002 10:10:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZqRH-0004IL-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:10:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZqRk-0003l0-00; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 06:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.163.1] helo=mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZqR0-0003hq-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 06:10:27 -0400 Original-Received: from burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.19]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DD2A3831; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:10:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id B108B2613A; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:10:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: rm@fabula.de In-Reply-To: <20020731100300.GC5661@www> Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:897 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:897 rm@fabula.de writes: > Would it be usefull to provide a scm_* function for it? Yes. I will add this to CVS. However, I'd say it is better to code all module system manipulations in Scheme and try to keep the C code 'module system ignorant' if that is possible. Why do you want to perform module system operations from C? Maybe there is a more elegant way. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel