From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SCM_PTR_LE ? Date: 01 Aug 2002 22:09:34 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <15682.60268.422843.138038@blauw.xs4all.nl> <15687.4663.59228.939494@blauw.xs4all.nl> <15689.27909.668671.145902@meddo.cs.uu.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028232632 20714 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2002 20:10:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 20:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17aMHH-0005Ny-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 22:10:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17aMHn-0006XN-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 16:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.163.1] helo=mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17aMHA-0006U6-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 16:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.19]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76ED0A3831; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:10:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id 27BAD26253; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:09:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys In-Reply-To: <15689.27909.668671.145902@meddo.cs.uu.nl> Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:924 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:924 Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > However, that point is completely moot, since the binary search code > in heap_segment () (new GC: scm_find_heap_segment_containing_object) > is full of code that compares pointers outside their blocks. Unless > that is scrapped (not), SCM_PTR_* can go. Ok, so you say that SCM_PTR_* is not used consistently and is therefore broken anyway, right? If that's the case (and I trust you there) then SCM_PTR_* can really go. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel