From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: status: separation of expansion/optimization/memoization/execution Date: 05 Aug 2002 20:15:12 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <15691.51367.455100.152498@blauw.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028571326 27189 127.0.0.1 (5 Aug 2002 18:15:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dirk Herrmann , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bmO4-00074J-00 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 20:15:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bmOj-0001I6-00; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 14:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.163.1] helo=mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bmOZ-0001FY-00 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 14:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.19]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF5DA3832; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:15:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id DD9882613A; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:15:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl In-Reply-To: <15691.51367.455100.152498@blauw.xs4all.nl> Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:991 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:991 Han-Wen writes: > FWIW, I "installed" some of the GC benchmarks over here --pretty > trivial-- and the code is GPL, but probably not (c) assigned. We can't > accept it then, Marius (right?), so shall I try asking the guy for a > disclaimer & assignment? (I think it has a slim chance working). Well, I'm not really sure about this, but I would say that supporting material does not need to be copyrighted by the FSF. The risk is that when some code is not (C) FSF, the FSF can not be sure that the license really is GPL and might be forced to take the code out again. When that happens to the benchmark suite, Guile itself is not terminally harmed. If you can get a disclaimer (there are several options), so much the better. I'm a bad thinker when it comes to licenses. It's better to ask . _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel