I'm going to throw my hat in the ring here, as I have some experience maintaining a Gitlab server. Please, please do not move to it. There is forced CI integration, and tons of SaaSS features like a web IDE you can not remove. If there is consideration of moving to a different git-hosting platform, please consider Drew DeVault's https://sr.ht// I am not paid to say this, I just really like what he is doing. ------ Original message------From: Nala GinrutDate: Tue, Jan 22, 2019 8:14 PMTo: Greg Troxel;Cc: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué;guile-devel;Subject:Re: moving to gitlab? First, I hope Guile can use gitlab.However, IIRC, RMS has some comments on this, the hosting service must be free, and it shouldn't allow to fork, but branch-based. This is reasonable to protect project, but RMS speaks as a skilled hacker, I have to say it's very good policy in a professional engineers team to be branch-based.But nowadays, people hope FOSS project be easier to contribute, fork is easier for them.I accept patches on Gitlab for GNU Artanis. BTW, that's the main reason I write GNU Artanis, since I'd like to provide a new Savannah to provide modern services and abey FSF ethic. Although it's in a very slow stepping toward to final target... Greg Troxel 于 2019年1月23日周三 09:32写道： Aleix Conchillo Flaqué writes: > Any chance or interest in moving to gitlab? My apologies if this has > been discussed already. Not that I ever contribute anything directly > to Guile (2 patches in 6 years?), but it feels like it would be an > improvement in terms of communication, sending patches, etc. May be it > would even encourage more developers to contribute? Sending patches > over a mailing list shouldn't be a thing anymore. Again, my apologies. I can't speak for the coalition, but generally there is a notion that FSF projects are hosted on infrastructure operated by a charitable non-profit that has the advancement of Free Software as the goal. Also, history shows that the place people move to because of concerns about $PREVIOSU_PLACE will follow suit eventually... If your point is that the self-hosted infrastructure should have some way for random poeple to provide in-tool changes, that sounds sensible.