From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Hahnfeld via "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile 64-bit Windows support, redux Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 21:19:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1629803116.370682.1686084646758.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1629803116.370682.1686084646758@mail.yahoo.com> <3f3c0be57479e0566ada30b0a012d9d6876281d5.camel@hahnjo.de> Reply-To: Jonas Hahnfeld Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3aMYD3Fe9KBjCxHTh0/r" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10128"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.3 Cc: Mike Gran , "guile-devel@gnu.org" To: "Thompson, David" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 07 21:19:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rXoOW-0002SQ-HR for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 21:19:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXoOH-0005hP-UB; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 15:19:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXoOE-0005h4-TD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 15:19:27 -0500 Original-Received: from backus.hahnjo.de ([2a03:4000:2a:2c1::1] helo=mail.hahnjo.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXoOC-0006sa-Uv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 15:19:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [IPv6:2a01:cb15:302:b500:478b:73c7:fdf0:1e6f] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb15:302:b500:478b:73c7:fdf0:1e6f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hahnjo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C191764E211; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 21:19:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hahnjo.de; s=default; t=1707337158; bh=WSoCkFqYgu4z8r8VdvcFI/B1soOP7D3D7NOZPw1lVuA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=WfAZDSWwB4pgJMxG4ViPSRaNUaSOjPXcc2HfXcTAPoFuCypPb68BwS5UDU4fLbN+J KTqBqsOkfTG63M2c0t8PnDX3ez3f7S2kckw0o00fmGPm+QAnTh4msI/TMD4lv6qVZn wRZ08hH+rbXk4+7SQySliA/M3UKRw5gJfTGh+BP64XdTsAtYddA9QZ+cuMXKdxYTpb jH+Yz95qadiUeM7ZA2cTEKhwb39pxsR5XnUEqAuot/jhNcYFBXWGLytY80+1q2/rRK dS8rVuffFqjm0kaNIG1eX8WXXFP/OaPnDuGj9cijVPcyig40jOCU/e1izNFKcF4RzM gyk+PAeE9JIkw== In-Reply-To: Autocrypt: addr=hahnjo@hahnjo.de; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 1WSpEpdF+beU48rqaxEWLmLWkQy/3Vl571F21U+XP Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a03:4000:2a:2c1::1; envelope-from=hahnjo@hahnjo.de; helo=mail.hahnjo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:22305 Archived-At: --=-3aMYD3Fe9KBjCxHTh0/r Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 09:19 -0500, Thompson, David wrote: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:40=E2=80=AFAM Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list= for > Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote: > >=20 > > On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:04 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > >=20 > > > Ping, any comments on this approach? I built binaries for LilyPond > > > 2.25.10 using these patches applied on top of Guile 3.0.9 and the > > > result seems to work fine on Windows. > >=20 > > Another ping; meanwhile we switched to building the official binaries > > of LilyPond with Guile 3.0 starting from version 2.25.11, but it would > > be really great to get rid of our downstream patches... >=20 > Just chiming in to say this is a very exciting development that I had > missed when the patch set was first sent! >=20 > Does this allow a fully featured Guile build or are some things still > disabled? Does JIT work? It's functional enough to run LilyPond (which uses quite a bit of Guile) and well enough so that there is only one complaint (that I know of so far) about multiplication with negative numbers not working right. If I remember correctly from quickly having a look, that's related to scm_integer_mul_ii using long_magnitude which doesn't quite work on Windows 64-bit. For LilyPond, we disable some features (JIT, threading, networking; you can look at the full build recipe here: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/blob/master/release/binaries/lib/dep= endencies.py#L628 ) and I don't know which of these would work or how much it would take to support them. Jonas --=-3aMYD3Fe9KBjCxHTh0/r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEXw/5YGpL6H9VOgO2kcnDPSxhrNsFAmXD5cEACgkQkcnDPSxh rNuXwgf+J3w9/HWrlXGq8SMCt7wKdHE4KOelvKLkYKgcNY7JzcgOrQcWbO1+X85w 8y0VlkxkdcDCxDl9f99MJlDp/4D570I/3PLDdTgFQLKmgb4lQTzTTHKlmnpR7gSO SgrF4lhc0pVybqWxW38hXEgTyQVjhpFF8y5FDoUTYJrJS1qz5u1Y1asvkgqqoYQZ uYa7cAntLn6W1BKYmcFTWATNdhkCmT0U39l8vdLzG47iKcnQWFJ4sa4351k0vTRp HME5noa9WrRBmOnoTN4FdK1AtOeG/qn44MP9VSsHn4LMvqX5BNQxqWCEzJzPUfRY F4EeqQypqlxreIMPczxWU5hunbomiQ== =3X5m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3aMYD3Fe9KBjCxHTh0/r--