From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile + Boehm GC: First Remarks Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:04:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877j42r32u.fsf@laas.fr> <87irnmt0nk.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ac8x8g35.fsf@laas.fr> <87lksgqv1r.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877j3zlofr.fsf@laas.fr> Reply-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160870713 6021 80.91.229.2 (15 Oct 2006 00:05:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 15 02:05:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYtV5-0006u0-9g for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:05:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYtV4-00052o-R6 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GYtUz-00051C-Fg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GYtUx-0004yE-QG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYtUx-0004y0-Mf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:04:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GYtdj-00051x-Km for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GYtUr-0006rf-Mv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:04:53 +0200 Original-Received: from muurbloem.xs4all.nl ([213.84.26.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:04:53 +0200 Original-Received: from hanwen by muurbloem.xs4all.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:04:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: muurbloem.xs4all.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061008) In-Reply-To: <877j3zlofr.fsf@laas.fr> X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6152 Archived-At: Ludovic Courtès schreef: > > But please, relax about performance, we still haven't run any meaningful > benchmark. ;-) btw, is there any news on this patch? I'm quite keen on dumping LilyPond's Rational class in favor of Scheme rationals, but adding gc mark functions for that is just too much work; BGC would be a nice soluiton to this. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel