From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: hanwen@byrd.xs4all.nl (Han-Wen Nienhuys) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: scheme closures: crash during garbage collection Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Organization: LilyPond development Message-ID: References: <64e2f6fe0606081528m4e5f9979yff9b8294ecedf6d2@mail.gmail.com> <87mzclmjq8.fsf@zagadka.de> <87odwyt33x.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> Reply-To: hanwen@lilypond.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1150155235 5293 80.91.229.2 (12 Jun 2006 23:33:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 13 01:33:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpvui-0005oZ-0J for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:33:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpvuh-0006Dc-FN for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:33:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpvue-0006DV-KG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpvud-0006DF-3V for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpvuc-0006DC-TW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:33:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fpw3R-0000uZ-Sc for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FpvuP-0005kf-Qn for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:33:25 +0200 Original-Received: from muurbloem.xs4all.nl ([213.84.26.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:33:25 +0200 Original-Received: from hanwen by muurbloem.xs4all.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:33:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: muurbloem.xs4all.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: hanwen@byrd.xs4all.nl (Han-Wen Nienhuys) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5979 Archived-At: In article <87odwyt33x.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net>, Neil Jerram wrote: >If I've understood correctly, this isn't possible in Gregory's >scenario. > >(See >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-gtk-general/2006-06/msg00013.html >if you didn't see the whole description on guile-gtk-general already.) I don't understand. The way I read it, Gregory concludes his email with a solution for his problem. In any event, it's easy to write your own GC protection scheme, which can have different semantics. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel