From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Patrick McCarty Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Backward compatibility status Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:12:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87r5nxug7k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268608381 8089 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2010 23:13:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 15 00:12:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqwzQ-0002BS-3k for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:12:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38460 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqwzP-0006Lw-5A for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:12:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NqwzK-0006Iy-RI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:12:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60274 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqwzH-0006Fr-Kt for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:12:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqwzF-0006Yt-E9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:52915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqwzF-0006Ym-9c; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:12:45 -0400 Original-Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so738538wyf.0 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:12:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2fMxqEblM9s6e5qn9FJCCi7JpExDdt4UJvC50PZyWVE=; b=MNls8WOdHk1aZzRgLbQvf6d6ZoYwPlpbuCo5448VHGERWYTavytvYhgmwkMEKao13Z gwH504fDAvt/PgWUMOeHSUvskMnt4ErtUDo3CYA1Dxrk1cxdSR5lrkf833IMMonXHx92 XW8kuWyV2L//odnGuN65iOieAOY1YIGxQYeTM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Vs6AAnWh9sDPbMITClHy7nTM1zWmj4UVmVP9RvangzMrx6/RzJr9AZQwsNQYqbVrg0 t/tS4D0iL4XQ8GN5jt6c5z1h5dxLfaGKLyP3TG3xP+ISeP5rcjQC/K9CtWrgZBIK21bC SquFs9UsUwkkC6omVJGgYMKqhTbciFBHt+qHE= Original-Received: by 10.216.86.211 with SMTP id w61mr256738wee.50.1268608363560; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:12:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r5nxug7k.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10052 Archived-At: Hi, 2010/3/6 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s : > > A number of Guile-using applications and libraries are tested against > the latest 1.9 release, using a recent stable release: > > =C2=A0http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/guile2test/with-status > > As you can see, there=E2=80=99s a lot of red crosses, but you can help! = =C2=A0:-) Thanks for posting this. > Here=E2=80=99s a summary of the reasons of these build failures: > > | Name =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| Cause =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 | > |---------------------------------------+--------------------------------= -----------------| > | lilypond-2.13.9 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 | `scm_internal_hash_fold' & `scm_t_hash_fold_fn' | Is this something that should be fixed in LilyPond? For reference, I'm fairly certain this build failure was introduced with Guile commit a07010bf1828704edd9a40cadb0eaf820b8f3638. If I add the typedefs to the appropriate LilyPond header file and use them, the problem goes away, but I don't know if there are unexpected side effects of this. I am unable to test any further, because there are more build failures down the pipeline. :-) Thanks, Patrick