Op 30-09-2023 om 15:17 schreef Christine Lemmer-Webber:
> Haven't fully caught up on this thread, but as a side note I have a
> mostly-finished implementation of a Wisp parser which takes a very
> different approach than Arne's, and was more understandable to me
> personally, a bit more functional and recursive-descent style.
> 
> I could make it available if anyone is curious.
> 
> Would love to see Wisp in Guile proper!

I think I technically can't count as ‘curious’ here, as I don't think 
I'll actually read this other implementation, but I would be interested 
in it nonetheless (to potentially replace Arne's implementation later, 
once it's complete), because it sounds like you might have avoided the 
REPR (*) bug thing from Arne's implementation.

(*) Extremely unlikely to be a problem in practice, but still a bug.

Best regards,
Maxime Devos.