On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:
> On 21-08-2022 02:05, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote:
> 
> > According to the spec, embedding inline content in the <script> tag
> > should conform to the language defined by the "type" attribute (defaults
> > to javascript). So, I would expect you could put any string that
> > conforms to JS.
> > 
> > """
> > When used to include dynamic scripts, the scripts may either be embedded
> > inline or may be imported from an external file using the src attribute.
> > If the language is not that described by "text/javascript", then the
> > type attribute must be present, as described below. Whatever language is
> > used, the contents of the script element must conform with the
> > requirements of that language's specification
> 
> I am proposing to use XHTML (which is XML), not HTML. HTML's special parsing
> quirks are irrelevant here.

Yes, the problem evaporates with XHTML. If you are at the generating side
(like here), that's definitely an option.

Cheers
-- 
t