From: "Kjetil S. Matheussen" <k.s.matheussen@notam02.no>
To: "Kjetil S. Matheussen" <k.s.matheussen@notam02.no>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Guile Summer of Code project
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:47:48 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803251847271.8983@ttleush> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803251814010.8983@ttleush>
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>
> Neil Jerram:
>>
>> Luis Araujo <araujo@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > Hello everyone , how are you?
>>
>> Hi Luis!
>>
>> Thanks for posting this proposal. I haven't read every detail yet,
>> but have one initial query, and would be interested in your thoughts.
>>
>> It seems like it would be a big job to write a C parser in Guile, and
>> it also seems that the really interesting results would flow from what
>> one could do with the parser output - but that the existence of the
>> parser on its own would not be that exciting.
>>
>> Therefore I'm wondering if there isn't already a C parser -
>> implemented in some other language - that you could use to work first
>> on the interesting possible applications of having a C parser.
>>
>> This is all assuming, of course, that there is a C parser available
>> somewhere that would generate the right kind of output, and I haven't
>> actually researched that. But it seems to me that the advantages of
>> doing things this way round would be that
>>
>> - it would bring concrete advantages to Guile more quickly
>>
>> - the process of working on applications would probably make clear
>> whether a Guile-implemented C parser would provide extra benefits,
>> and would probably indicate what kind of parser interface and/or
>> output would be most useful and convenient.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> For me it sounds like you would achieve exactly the same just
> by combining the output of either swig[1] or gwrap[2] and
> feed it into eval-c[3-4]. Perhaps 5-6 hours of work, probably
> less...
>
> [1] http://www.swig.org
> [2] http://www.nongnu.org/g-wrap/
> [3] http://snd.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/snd/cvs-snd/eval-c.scm
> [4] http://www.notam02.no/~kjetism/sndrt_lac2008.pdf
>
>
Also see this mail from december:
http://www.mail-archive.com/guile-devel@gnu.org/msg02034.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-25 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cmu-lmtpd-31700-1206464752-1@mail-imap1.uio.no>
2008-03-25 17:19 ` Guile Summer of Code project Kjetil S. Matheussen
2008-03-25 17:47 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen [this message]
2008-03-25 21:45 ` Neil Jerram
[not found] <cmu-lmtpd-30052-1206637626-0@mail-imap1.uio.no>
2008-03-27 17:36 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2008-03-27 17:57 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2008-03-20 10:12 Luis Araujo
2008-03-24 23:40 ` Neil Jerram
2008-03-26 20:52 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0803251847271.8983@ttleush \
--to=k.s.matheussen@notam02.no \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).