From: Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <k.s.matheussen@notam02.no>
To: Bill Schottstaedt <bil@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Experience with guile + Boehm GC in SND (Re: New versions of rt-compiler.scm, rt-examples.scm and rt.tex
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:57:15 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706031646420.19138@iannis.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070603110930.M29119@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
(CC guile-dev)
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
> Thanks! I'll merge your changes into my versions this morning.
> I saw some discussion about the Boehm GC, but I didn't try it --
> let me know how it goes!
>
I have it running now, and it feels much better. (gc) still triggers a
glip in the sound though, but thats to be expected.
But the good things are (with snd_conffils.scm loaded):
* I don't hear any glips in the sound using a dac-size of 64. Can't
remember that ever working before. Even a dac-size of 1 almost works.
* When changing the range, there is no sign of the graphics now and then
lagging behind. I have never seen that before.
However, I need to run a test with the normal guile 1.9 as well. It might
not be because of the Boehm GC, but I think so. I'll report back in case
it wasn't the new GC.
I'm thinking about releasing a new version of snd-ls with embedded guile +
boehm gc patch. It'll be a monster package, but snd feels so nice now that
I might do it.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-03 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706031204540.9006@ttleush>
[not found] ` <20070603110930.M29119@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
2007-06-03 14:57 ` Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen [this message]
2007-06-03 16:33 ` Experience with guile + Boehm GC in SND (Re: New versions of rt-compiler.scm, rt-examples.scm and rt.tex Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
2007-06-03 20:07 ` Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
2007-06-04 11:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-06-04 12:08 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 12:45 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 13:22 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-06-04 16:11 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 16:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-06-04 18:00 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 18:14 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-05 7:53 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0706031646420.19138@iannis.localdomain \
--to=k.s.matheussen@notam02.no \
--cc=bil@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).