From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dirk Herrmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 00:41:40 +0200 (CEST) Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031265718 7305 127.0.0.1 (5 Sep 2002 22:41:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 22:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Wolfgang =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E4hrling?= , guile-devel@gnu.org, wolfgang@pro-linux.de Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17n5K0-0001tg-00 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:41:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17n5Lb-00043m-00; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 18:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17n5Jp-0003qw-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 18:41:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17n5Jn-0003qf-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 18:41:44 -0400 Original-Received: from sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de ([134.169.132.52]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17n5Jm-0003qb-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 18:41:42 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (dirk@localhost) by sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA10652; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 00:41:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys In-Reply-To: Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1318 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1318 On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Dirk Herrmann wrote: > > I believe that the error is that the object is in fact collected, when > > it should not have been. At least, that's what I gather from the message. > > No, the test names are fomulated to describe the successfull case: > "(+ 1 2) gives 2", > which sounds right when read as: > PASS: "(+ 1 2) gives 2" > or > FAIL: "(+ 1 2) gives 2" > > Best regards, > Dirk Well, funny. Who is that guy that wrote this last message? Could we ban him from the list for writing up such nonsense ? ;-) Please, stop rolling on the floor and simply replace "(+ 1 2) gives 2" by "(+ 1 1) gives 2" Thanks for being mercyful with me. Dirk _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel