From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Items blocking release 1.6.1 (2002-04-21) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:52:02 -0700 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <874ri3jxqx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019509058 16386 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2002 20:57:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mvo@zagadka.ping.de, guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zksU-0004GB-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:57:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zksE-00053O-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u4-c4c-174.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.66.186.174] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zkqx-0004xN-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zkn4-00009O-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:52:02 -0700 Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org In-Reply-To: <874ri3jxqx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob Browning on Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:15:34 -0500) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:455 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:455 From: Rob Browning Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:15:34 -0500 If you think it's worth forking guile over this, please do. you missed the irony: the act of introducing gratuitous incompatibility (and subsequently allowing it to fester) is de facto "forking guile". guile credibility is down because it has been f**ked so, many times. paraphrased from some sig: it's not foolish to do foolish things, it's foolish if we don't see the folly. personally, i was foolish to think i could help guile improve w/o seeing the folly that it is the guile maintainers who need to improve (which is outside my control). thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel