From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Items blocking release 1.6.1 (2002-04-21) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:35:28 -0700 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87d6wtqawx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019464943 29321 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2002 08:42:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zZOw-0007co-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:42:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zZOh-0002Tl-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 04:42:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u4-c4c-174.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.66.186.174] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zZMF-0002BQ-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 04:39:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zZIG-0000Ha-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:35:28 -0700 Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org In-Reply-To: <87d6wtqawx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob Browning on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:22:22 -0500) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:442 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:442 From: Rob Browning Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:22:22 -0500 Since I've had no negative feeback regarding my release management posts, I'm planning to add those to our policy documentation and proceed accordingly. i'm making my way up to a full response (w/ some hopefully constructive feedback)... gist is: good first stab! however, you risk bad PR karma if you write policy that you don't follow. that is akin to writing code that you don't use. adding these writings to workbook/ in present form is fine -- any required refinements can only benefit from early publishing and the consequently wider review. don't let my pending response (probably done tomorrow) gate your cvs commits. thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel