From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: kudos and observation Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 14:04:59 -0800 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <15525.26721.978797.441772@winona.neilvandyke.org> <15531.248.122662.447359@winona.neilvandyke.org> <15531.57908.543968.121031@winona.neilvandyke.org> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017960612 29478 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2002 22:50:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16tG3Y-0007fL-00 for ; Fri, 05 Apr 2002 00:50:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16tFQH-0001CD-00; Thu, 04 Apr 2002 17:09:37 -0500 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u4-c4c-174.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.66.186.174] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16tFOy-000111-00 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2002 17:08:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16tFLn-0004v2-00; Thu, 04 Apr 2002 14:04:59 -0800 Original-To: nwv@neilvandyke.org In-Reply-To: <15531.57908.543968.121031@winona.neilvandyke.org> (nwv@neilvandyke.org) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:305 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:305 From: "Neil W. Van Dyke" Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:18:44 -0500 For now, I've had to switch to a different Scheme implementation for my work, so that will be the one to which I have occasion to make any modest contributions. i'd be interested in learning which other scheme and why you switched (perhaps this info can be used to improve guile). I would also be tempted immensely by good Guile GTK2/Pango/Libart support (and it must be free of Mono and Gnome), but that's perhaps another matter. yes. there is room for a Wrapping Czar in the project, someone whose goal would be to actively develop and integrate g-wrap, rationalize (and possibly advance a unified interface to) the various linkages available, and promote the wrapping approach w/ some well-chosen examples. these are difficult things to do. thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel