From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Introspective benchmarking. Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 01:01:20 -0800 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87pu1zucdi.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017831052 1859 127.0.0.1 (3 Apr 2002 10:50:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16siLs-0000Ts-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 12:50:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16shHg-0003xB-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 04:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u4-c4c-174.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.66.186.174] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16sggp-0006pZ-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 04:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16sgds-0002ct-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 01:01:20 -0800 Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org In-Reply-To: <87pu1zucdi.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob Browning on Tue, 19 Mar 2002 21:49:45 -0600) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:290 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:290 From: Rob Browning Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 21:49:45 -0600 I feel like it would be extremely helpful to have a set of benchmarks that we can run in order to help evaluate our changes. While I'm well aware of the risks involved in benchmarking, I think even a moderately good set could provide a healthy sanity check of our efforts. yeah it's good to get that stuff in now (while guile is slow ;-). it should not be put in guile-core, that's for sure... pick a sensible place under workbook/ and go for it (twiddle TODO for the spider). thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel