From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:34:17 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87n0x01bci.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87u1r77a7c.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87wuw2gk81.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87n0wxzol5.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87lmcgz7bz.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017092202 15933 127.0.0.1 (25 Mar 2002 21:36:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pc8v-00048s-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:36:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pc8i-0004Az-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:36:28 -0500 Original-Received: from colo.agora-net.com ([207.245.85.68]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pc6h-0003sV-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 16pc6b-0001IH-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:34:17 -0500 Original-To: mvo@zagadka.ping.de In-Reply-To: <87lmcgz7bz.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (message from Marius Vollmer on 25 Mar 2002 22:05:36 +0100) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:196 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:196 From: Marius Vollmer Date: 25 Mar 2002 22:05:36 +0100 Whatever. Let's not unproductively quibble over this. Let's just say that numbers are OK, too. ultimately it is the tools (and whoever writes the tools) that make the decisions. our discussion is completely unproductive in its nature, but hopefully Evan weighs the points brought up and contributes something that makes you happy (and that you won't go gratuitously re-writing). A directory can be seen as a related file, as well, I'd say: bug-12.stuff/ I'll mention this as well. I will just trot along in workbook/bugs even if we don't have complete consensus yet. I want to use the new mechanism already for better managing the 1.6 release. i thought your position was that the new mechanism should not gate 1.6 release. what made you change your mind? thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel