From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Language bindings Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:01:14 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017090206 13500 127.0.0.1 (25 Mar 2002 21:03:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pbcj-0003Vd-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:03:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pbcR-00080G-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: from colo.agora-net.com ([207.245.85.68]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pbak-0007vm-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 16pbac-0000dA-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:01:14 -0500 Original-To: 0rfelyus@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz In-Reply-To: (message from Daniel Skarda on 25 Mar 2002 15:04:43 +0100) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:193 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:193 From: Daniel Skarda <0rfelyus@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Date: 25 Mar 2002 15:04:43 +0100 I would like to ask, which way I should choose - SourceForge, Guile CVS repository or something else? Which one you prefer for development for Guile language bindings? state of the art for wrapping libraries w/ guile bindings still requires a lot of manual work, so maintaining this project per se does not yield as widely useful results as maintaining this project as a test case for general wrapping tools. from that point of view, i would suggest contributing the written code to g-wrap and encouraging people to hack there (i.e., "in examples/opengl there are hand-crafted bindings by Daniel Skarda; type "make" in that directory to see g-wrap (attempt to ;-) produce functionally equivalent bindings"). on the other hand, there are probably many people who would be interested in including your work in their project (guile-sdl comes to mind), w/ more direct usage/maintenance relationship w/ the code than those hacking general wrapping tools. perhaps asking your question on guile-user would attract those people to giving the opengl bindings berth. (then they will ask these same questions later. :-) alternatively, you can do the common thing and dump the project to rot on sorceforge or savannah. i don't recommend this unless you have someone lined up to take the reins. thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel