From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:32:11 -0800 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87n0x01bci.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87u1r77a7c.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87wuw2gk81.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87n0wxzol5.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017045580 2963 127.0.0.1 (25 Mar 2002 08:39:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pQ0y-0000lg-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:39:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pPxf-0007nl-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 03:36:15 -0500 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u3-c5c-122.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.64.59.122] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pPwh-0007go-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 03:35:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pPtj-0006vZ-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:32:11 -0800 Original-To: mvo@zagadka.ping.de In-Reply-To: <87n0wxzol5.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (message from Marius Vollmer on 24 Mar 2002 21:40:38 +0100) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:189 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:189 From: Marius Vollmer Date: 24 Mar 2002 21:40:38 +0100 I don't think bugs need numbers, just no-bugs-database should be enough. numbers are symbolic (see comp.lang.lisp thread on packaging). they have extra properties that are useful for ordering and concise to reference. Yes, good point. What about simply saying that the bug file itself has no "." in its name, and related files like test scripts do? i suggest dot dirs in my other mail (using numbers, but i fancy N.SHORT-DESC would be the righteous hybrid solution). thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel