From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:41:47 -0800 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016833858 24316 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2002 21:50:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 21:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16oWw5-0006Js-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:50:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oWvj-0000az-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:50:35 -0500 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u3-c5c-122.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.64.59.122] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oWqA-0000L2-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:44:50 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16oWnD-00031U-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:41:47 -0800 Original-To: evan@glug.org Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:159 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:159 From: Evan Prodromou Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:34:17 -0800 You're assuming that I want to be helpful more than I want to rant. B-) true. ranting is in some respects helpful. now that you've waxed on, the next step is to wax off... But, OK. I'll re-write the bugs parser thingy, as well as a converter to move from the current format to a new RFC format. Can I define the headers for Bug files? Please? probably since Rob has detailed some plans already he can give you better direction here. i suppose it was uncool of me to suggest you do something that he may have already started doing. if Rob has this initiative staked out but you're still interested in codified ranting (as any sane person would be ;-), i have suggestions on other ways to align your wishlist w/ current efforts. thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel