From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:08:27 -0800 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016827977 3317 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2002 20:12:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16oVPF-0000rO-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 21:12:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oVOg-0000zD-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:12:22 -0500 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u3-c5c-122.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.64.59.122] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oVNk-0000t3-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:11:24 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16oVKt-0002vI-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:08:27 -0800 Original-To: evan@glug.org Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:156 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:156 From: Evan Prodromou Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:40:01 -0600 HOWEVER, it seems that perhaps maintaining the current bug file format (except, of course, splitting up bugs between files) might get one "there" faster than hoping for -- or hacking on -- an RFC822 parser. usable rfc822 parsers have already been written (by at least two people on this mailing list, probably everyone has one in their personal tool kit). the program you posted for html-izing BUGS can be easily refitted to use one of these parsers. why don't you do this instead of trying to convince other people not to do this? it would be very helpful. thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel