From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Stable branch will freeze. Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 03:47:38 -0800 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87vgbywwxp.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016213083 5565 127.0.0.1 (15 Mar 2002 17:24:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mvo@zagadka.ping.de, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([195.204.10.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16lvQa-0000PZ-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:23:40 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164]) by hermes.netfonds.no (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g2FDELM17457 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:14:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lrSE-0006VP-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u3-c5c-122.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.64.59.122] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lqEC-0007gj-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 06:50:32 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16lqBO-00005F-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 03:47:38 -0800 Original-To: neil@ossau.uklinux.net In-Reply-To: (message from Neil Jerram on 15 Mar 2002 09:24:06 +0000) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:61 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:61 From: Neil Jerram Date: 15 Mar 2002 09:24:06 +0000 I think that's rather harsh, thi. A small amount of focus and control to get a release out is hardly dictatorship. true, but focus and control were not demonstrated, only intimated. the reality is no one here controls anyone but themselves (and obviously in my case i can't even do that very well ;-). why make noise otherwise? wrt focus, this looks promising: The real problem here is that we don't have a shared view of what is release critical. We used to, but I think that sense was blown off course by the volume of bugs that have been reported recently. so how do we go about (re-)nailing down this shared view? more precisely, what is the path under devel/ where you propose to check in the release-critical shared view? thi _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel