From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
To: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: minor SCM_DEBUG patch
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:51:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DF2C427C-DA67-46D5-905B-486A998C4A32@raeburn.org> (raw)
The SCM_GC_MARK_P macro doesn't exist any more, but is still mentioned
in a few places. With SCM_DEBUG defined, one of them actually gets
compiled. While looking at this, I also noticed three macros in
deprecated.h (which were there in 1.8) which use non-existent macros
including SCM_GC_MARK_P, and deleted those too. I didn't touch the
other uses of SCM_GC_MARK_P in futures.c.
With this, and my pair-checking patches for objects.c and eval.i.c
(sent September 5, still awaiting review from a developer familiar
enough with the code), I can build a version with SCM_DEBUG that
passes tests.
Related but not addressed here: Several places still check
scm_gc_running_p and conditionally execute code (or not), but it's now
defined as a macro always expanding to 0.
Clean up some uses of old GC macros that don't exist any more.
* libguile/deprecated.h (SCM_GC8MARKP, SCM_SETGC8MARK,
SCM_CLRGC8MARK):
Delete.
* libguile/gc.c (scm_assert_cell_valid): Remove check of
SCM_GC_MARK_P.
diff --git a/libguile/deprecated.h b/libguile/deprecated.h
index ed1a105..5680d09 100644
--- a/libguile/deprecated.h
+++ b/libguile/deprecated.h
@@ -120,9 +120,6 @@ SCM_DEPRECATED SCM scm_unprotect_object (SCM obj);
(SCM_SETCDR ((x), SCM_PACK (SCM_UNPACK (SCM_CDR (x)) | (y))))
#define SCM_FREEP(x) (0)
#define SCM_NFREEP(x) (1)
-#define SCM_GC8MARKP(x) SCM_GC_MARK_P (x)
-#define SCM_SETGC8MARK(x) SCM_SET_GC_MARK (x)
-#define SCM_CLRGC8MARK(x) SCM_CLEAR_GC_MARK (x)
#define SCM_GCTYP16(x) SCM_TYP16 (x)
#define SCM_GCCDR(x) SCM_CDR (x)
SCM_DEPRECATED void scm_remember (SCM * ptr);
diff --git a/libguile/gc.c b/libguile/gc.c
index 9c56d04..96e3c30 100644
--- a/libguile/gc.c
+++ b/libguile/gc.c
@@ -146,18 +146,7 @@ scm_assert_cell_valid (SCM cell)
*/
if (scm_expensive_debug_cell_accesses_p)
scm_i_expensive_validation_check (cell);
-#if (SCM_DEBUG_MARKING_API == 0)
- if (!SCM_GC_MARK_P (cell))
- {
- fprintf (stderr,
- "scm_assert_cell_valid: this object is unmarked. \n"
- "It has been garbage-collected in the last GC run: "
- "%lux\n",
- (unsigned long) SCM_UNPACK (cell));
- abort ();
- }
-#endif /* SCM_DEBUG_MARKING_API */
-
+
scm_i_cell_validation_already_running = 0; /* re-enable */
}
}
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-29 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-29 17:51 Ken Raeburn [this message]
2009-10-30 21:23 ` minor SCM_DEBUG patch Neil Jerram
2009-10-31 23:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-11-03 1:47 ` Ken Raeburn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DF2C427C-DA67-46D5-905B-486A998C4A32@raeburn.org \
--to=raeburn@raeburn.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).