I just expressed "I think group capturing is useful and someone didn't
think that's true".
If this is not what your last mail mean, I think it's better to ignore it.

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Marijn <hkBst@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30-12-11 11:56, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> > Hmm, interesting! I must confess I'm not familiar with Racket, but
> > I think the aim of Guile contains practicality.
>
> Not sure what you're trying to imply here or to which of my points
> you're responding.
>
> > So I think regex-lib of Guile does this at least. Anyway, I believe
> > an implementation should do its best to provide any useful
> > mechanism for the user. Or it won't be popular anymore. When I talk
> > about "useful", I mean "it brings the user convenient", not "the
> > developer think it's useful".
>
> Idem ditto.
>
> > Just my mumble, no any offense. Thank you for telling us this
> > issue. ;-)
>
> Marijn
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk79pQ8ACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wMewCgml8guLqLK2fx7NWHa1JQ7pQ9
> wrIAoLkHJnNF8nkWWMM4EKkyBEyffZEQ
> =1IRy
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>