Preparing for 2.0.6

Preparing for 2.0.6

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello!

Still hesitant between writing a native code back-end for IA64 and
making Guile multiboot-compliant?  Hesitate no more!

Time has come for 2.0.6, so let’s squash bugs!

One thing I’d like to get in by then is the SRFI-9 “functional record
setters”.  Mark: what’s your take on this?

Optionally, integrating SRFI-64 would be great.

Other than that, fixing as many bugs as we can.

Any other ideas?

Andy: would you like to take care of NEWS?  :-)

I’ll be mostly away from July 9th for some time, so I could push the
tarball by then, or otherwise during the GHM.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Ian Price]

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Any other ideas?

Yes, could you or Andy look at my patch for chunked encoding? I first
pointed issue this out round about last September, and it would be nice
to finally have support for it in guile proper. I'm happy with the
overall design, but it may need a rebase first.

-- 
Ian Price

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Andy Wingo]

On Thu 28 Jun 2012 22:05, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Time has come for 2.0.6, so let’s squash bugs!

Yay!

> Andy: would you like to take care of NEWS?  :-)

Sure :)

> I’ll be mostly away from July 9th for some time, so I could push the
> tarball by then, or otherwise during the GHM.

Let's aim for 9 July, and check in next week and see how things are
going.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Noah Lavine]

I think bug 10623 is fixed in stable-2.0, but I don't know how to
close it in the tracker.

Thanks,
Noah

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Still hesitant between writing a native code back-end for IA64 and
> making Guile multiboot-compliant?  Hesitate no more!
>
> Time has come for 2.0.6, so let’s squash bugs!
>
> One thing I’d like to get in by then is the SRFI-9 “functional record
> setters”.  Mark: what’s your take on this?
>
> Optionally, integrating SRFI-64 would be great.
>
> Other than that, fixing as many bugs as we can.
>
> Any other ideas?
>
> Andy: would you like to take care of NEWS?  :-)
>
> I’ll be mostly away from July 9th for some time, so I could push the
> tarball by then, or otherwise during the GHM.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Nala Ginrut]

@Noah: Could you apply the patch to fix ecmascript?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-05/msg00001.html

@Andy: How about these patches:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00196.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00165.html

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think bug 10623 is fixed in stable-2.0, but I don't know how to
> close it in the tracker.
>
> Thanks,
> Noah
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Still hesitant between writing a native code back-end for IA64 and
>> making Guile multiboot-compliant?  Hesitate no more!
>>
>> Time has come for 2.0.6, so let’s squash bugs!
>>
>> One thing I’d like to get in by then is the SRFI-9 “functional record
>> setters”.  Mark: what’s your take on this?
>>
>> Optionally, integrating SRFI-64 would be great.
>>
>> Other than that, fixing as many bugs as we can.
>>
>> Any other ideas?
>>
>> Andy: would you like to take care of NEWS?  :-)
>>
>> I’ll be mostly away from July 9th for some time, so I could push the
>> tarball by then, or otherwise during the GHM.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo’.
>>
>>
>

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Noah Lavine]

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Noah: Could you apply the patch to fix ecmascript?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-05/msg00001.html

I think that's already done! Do you not see it in your tree?

Noah

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Nala Ginrut]

For stable-2.0?
I'm tracing wip-rtl these days, and it failed:

---------------error msg---------------
GNU Guile 2.1.0.322-e765d
Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details.

Enter `,help' for help.
scheme@(guile-user)> ,L ecmascript
Happy hacking with ECMAScript!  To switch back, type `,L scheme'.
ecmascript@(guile-user)> 1+1
... ;
While compiling expression:
ERROR: compilation not yet implemented: (case-lambda ((a100 a99) (let
((t102 (class-of a100)) (t101 (class-of a99))) (if (and (eq? t101
c104) (eq? t102 c108)) (p109 a100 a99) (if (and (eq? t101 c104) (eq?
t102 c106)) (p107 a100 a99) (if (and (eq? t101 c104) (eq? t102 c103))
(p105 a100 a99) (cache-miss g98 (list a100 a99))))))) (args
(cache-miss g98 args)))
ecmascript@(guile-user)> var a = 1+1;
ERROR: In procedure #<procedure e0f660 ()>:
ERROR: In procedure public-lookup: No variable bound to js-init in
module (language ecmascript impl)

Entering a new prompt.  Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
ecmascript@(guile-user) [1]>
-------------------end------------------------

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> @Noah: Could you apply the patch to fix ecmascript?
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-05/msg00001.html
>
> I think that's already done! Do you not see it in your tree?
>
> Noah

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi!

Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> skribis:

> For stable-2.0?

We’re talking about 2.0, yes.

Ludo’.

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Nala Ginrut]

Hmm...I still get that error message in stable-2.0 branch for ecmascript.
Did I miss anything?

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> For stable-2.0?
>
> We’re talking about 2.0, yes.
>
> Ludo’.

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello!

Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> skribis:

> Hmm...I still get that error message in stable-2.0 branch for ecmascript.

Which message?

Ludo’.

Re: Preparing for 2.0.6

[Nala Ginrut]

I thought it's fixed with my patch:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-05/msg00001.html
And Noah said it's done in the tree(I think it's stable-2.0), but I
still get the error message like this:

--------------------------error--------------------------
GNU Guile 2.0.5.182-162d9-dirty
Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details.

Enter `,help' for help.
scheme@(guile-user)> ,L ecmascript
Happy hacking with ECMAScript!  To switch back, type `,L scheme'.
ecmascript@(guile-user)> 1+1;
While compiling expression:
ERROR: compilation not yet implemented: (case-lambda ((a116 a115) (let
((t118 (class-of a116)) (t117 (class-of a115))) (if (and (eq? t117
c120) (eq? t118 c124)) (p125 a116 a115) (if (and (eq? t117 c120) (eq?
t118 c122)) (p123 a116 a115) (if (and (eq? t117 c120) (eq? t118 c119))
(p121 a116 a115) (cache-miss g114 (list a116 a115))))))) (args
(cache-miss g114 args)))
ecmascript@(guile-user)> var a=1+1;
ERROR: In procedure #<procedure fe9920 ()>:
ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: js-init

Entering a new prompt.  Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
ecmascript@(guile-user) [1]>
-----------------------------end------------------------------------------



On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Hmm...I still get that error message in stable-2.0 branch for ecmascript.
>
> Which message?
>
> Ludo’.