Just a report, the same compiling error existing in Guile-3.0.0.

Best regards.


On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:49 PM Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Wingo!
> Here're update:
> 1. 2.9.9 didn't fix this issue
>
> 2. I imported r6rs record-type in (artanis utils), and this module was
> imported in almost every artanis modules.
> I do use r6rs specific record API to introspect the internal things for
> debugging in Artanis.
> And I imported r6rs define-record-type in server-context.scm
> I guess there're some name conflicting.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 6:33 PM Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed 08 Jan 2020 15:22, Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > In unknown file:
>> >            4 (primitive-load-path "artanis/server/server-context" #<…>)
>> > In ice-9/eval.scm:
>> >    626:19  3 (_ #<directory (artanis server server-context) 5624d6b3…>)
>> >     155:9  2 (_ #<directory (artanis server server-context) 5624d6b3…>)
>> > In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>> >   1153:19  1 (_ _ _ _ _ _ _)
>> >   1655:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>> >
>> > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1655:16: In procedure raise-exception:
>> > Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure 5624d66ee4a0 at
>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1153:19 (a b c d e f)>
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Any hint that I can figure out whait's incompatible?
>>
>> Gosh we need to improve this info.  Anyway the procedure at
>> boot-9.scm:1153:19 is a record constructor, for a record with 6 fields.
>> Apparently somewhere in (artanis server server-context) is calling it
>> with the wrong number of arguments.  What do you use for records?  Do
>> you have your own abstraction or do you use R6RS records or something?
>> Perhaps something in artanis relied on the way that R6RS records used to
>> implement single inheritance, as a chain of objects instead of a flat
>> record.  Or perhaps the adaptations to R6RS records in Guile introduced
>> a bug.  I am interested to know the answer :)
>>
>> Andy
>>
>