From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nala Ginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tests for `for-rdelim-in-port`-related functions. Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 22:52:18 +0900 Message-ID: References: <43ad0b39-03cf-b648-3bc9-8c4a064519a8@disroot.org> <8e113f49-c1dc-313b-e65a-24a73c5b887a@disroot.org> <20241220101533.qxFY2D00e2kJuzj01xFZgG@baptiste.telenet-ops.be> <20241220125141.qzrg2D00G2kJuzj06zrg2X@albert.telenet-ops.be> <20241220135310.r0t92D0082kJuzj010t981@laurent.telenet-ops.be> <20241220144559.r1ly2D00i2kJuzj061lzzE@albert.telenet-ops.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000341bcb0629b3f5e1" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37280"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mikael@djurfeldt.com, Adam Faiz , guile-devel , Ricardo Wurmus , Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> To: Maxime Devos Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 20 14:53:05 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tOdRA-0009dG-61 for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:53:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOdQj-0006Mw-FX; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOdQi-0006Mk-6x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:52:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOdQf-0002Jh-DE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:52:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7fc99fc2b16so1158690a12.3 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 05:52:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1734702751; x=1735307551; darn=gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SiriZ82KVG8/5uaT80WyH5BvFCUuPRw1myCa6tRXR1s=; b=jW5xs/5CdVrunh8TtTXT9ZHZ2yedHp9C0p+tk2zv1pk6GjI2TCFrd4p1yFiaIu+piR yMIAgd5v+Up73DUeOZmrSquaWle7EThqGtZF00Gv3xXN0YTupKWf1oc7roW0MIhMBI8P u7I/VAlxwiToRM3TuSUdtyW6BGisv7NoE5PMIzDv3KjNpEYLkzPEnoH1N4RWSeVpzO9V cEypQ9vBqsC7jhkAks3t+xUWpIwT6z8EEaGtSVEO4ID8fxLgdpgwlIx3JtMzq69cZ0mb JkfbsXiBYQip7RJ+YXjuZNL+uxaP4V+h4tuN2UllI2uijdupn7t+TjZzoCksFABMOQti DY4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734702751; x=1735307551; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=SiriZ82KVG8/5uaT80WyH5BvFCUuPRw1myCa6tRXR1s=; b=kSS1y07y8htuXEvXbiSpcS9Oo7KHH1OTHXK8If3l0S/Hw5QSd5sGvYBcy71OJxl8oR jKEAIFb56tla+LD8jhFi/wzsBc2ksckoSG08VOTfb/h3iDRLp2R79dQIEgY9vyNlpwqW iseAcBGXzHbetOlSH/7K3BuzNF8OUvNMd/xP7Wt7QI0KiUWHAGN3kSG1HOrkU6NxmkXq 0t8Yg95CR/wmi5k6XDNHTl6Cx4XvVOZaWcoO3l+R64f5nZda+NjdPf6r7obgw6E+Pzfh Mpgxs04cq0/SBwIyEU3igL5eqQ4nXFEG+eE/PKIf3aRSRQ1J0doDI5zwohKcP01Z1NZn URaw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXRbbpc27NZibuZ7wIkV1km3YRSUb4Qj5jZoNZeKpyj4aNQ6qsdp+9IpvsT90sZx2dF1Gkyj52cya/gJg==@gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzESfXXBUnN/ZtHEegjrlc3oic8cjbJygJl6n7zUA9+GcAZcKLz fJ0YTXPjmhc8aii966ym3Qk9QnTHS8GAIfqmEGZQwXqgzrIr1H/65MYnMq9LM1gdm3UBAUAVq6V kQZ0opsYubQAnZWWD52IOlKIgMmJ1UuI+ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvlQJXiieXgMP4Ok0q1jCC7sPUSKVN4ZFNfxQvQPn5aNIatB3apHAOPYdldUiv lCt16/9fhRLJB+JMD9UBlkqHDPhXs9AjFzUwKvA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGD3tYPxNe1YsG2CemDskQBBGOz+ymev6FIoJeBCs3+2alTsCtXcBOoUkuJpsWsI7d2FBjf5iEii9XtXn/2tbE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:270d:b0:2ee:6736:8512 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f452e1636emr5800069a91.12.1734702749979; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 05:52:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20241220144559.r1ly2D00i2kJuzj061lzzE@albert.telenet-ops.be> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e; envelope-from=nalaginrut@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x52e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:22847 Archived-At: --000000000000341bcb0629b3f5e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >You can just say you've no idea about it, > > That=E2=80=99s true (i.e., I can say I have no idea about it), but I have= no > reason to lie about it, so I won=E2=80=99t. I did have an idea, and I gav= e the idea > to you, as I mentioned in my two previous replies. > > Thanks! This sentence saves a lot of time. Here are the "back to the track" reply for folks in this thread. So the situation is more clear now. The newline in various OS need to respectively tested. And my idea is to check OS via (uname) in test cases. Now that it's in tests, I think we don't have to talk much about the efficiency issue for this specific case. Welcome to comment this proposal. --000000000000341bcb0629b3f5e1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>You can jus= t say you've no idea about it,

That=E2=80=99s true (i.e., I can say I have no idea about it)= , but I have no reason to lie about it, so I won=E2=80=99t. I did have an i= dea, and I gave the idea to you, as I mentioned in my two previous replies.=


Thanks! This sentence saves a lot of time.

=
Here are the "back to the track" reply fo= r folks in this thread.

= So the situation is more clear now. The newline in various OS need to respe= ctively tested. And my idea is to check OS via (uname) in test cases.
=
Now that it's in tests, I think we don't have to = talk much about the efficiency issue for this specific case.

Welcome to comment this proposal.






--000000000000341bcb0629b3f5e1--