ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> skribis:

>
>> +(define (hash-keys table)
>> +  "Return all the keys from hash table."
>> +  (hash-map->list (lambda (x y) x) table))
>
> That doesn’t seem sufficiently common to warrant a new procedure.  WDYT?

FWIW, I think it would be reasonable to add 'hash-keys'.  Many users
are accustomed to writing in a style that's made more convenient by
'hash-keys', and in cases where efficiency is not crucial, I think
it's a fine style.  Also, sometimes the values aren't needed.

IMO, we can afford to add a few conveniences such as this.

      Mark