* What's the alternative of scm_new_port_table_entry?
@ 2018-04-04 10:16 Nala Ginrut
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nala Ginrut @ 2018-04-04 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
I found there're many issues after scm_new_port_table_entry was
removed recently:
--------------------------------------------
commit 9417fdb80fb5db4f657c9a329faaa61162ab996b
Author: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Date: Fri Feb 16 14:26:56 2018 +0100
doc: Fix typo about SRFI-4 syntax.
Reported by Matt Wette <matt.wette@gmail.com>.
...skipping...
(scm_new_port_table_entry): Remove; not useful.
-------------------------------------------
This breaks me when I'm trying to compile something required it.
And this change seems prevent people compile GDB with guile support:
https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng/issues/718
So what's the alternative of scm_new_port_table_entry to use ?
Best regards.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-04-04 10:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-04 10:16 What's the alternative of scm_new_port_table_entry? Nala Ginrut
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).