@Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
It's my mistake to call an incompatible constructor after I updated the
interfaces. I think Guile-3 made more strict checking because this mistake
wasn't caught before 2.9.

Now folks may use docker to try Artanis on Guile-3

docker pull registry.gitlab.com/nalaginrut/artanis:latest

Best regards.



On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 3:43 AM Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just a report, the same compiling error existing in Guile-3.0.0.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:49 PM Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Wingo!
>> Here're update:
>> 1. 2.9.9 didn't fix this issue
>>
>> 2. I imported r6rs record-type in (artanis utils), and this module was
>> imported in almost every artanis modules.
>> I do use r6rs specific record API to introspect the internal things for
>> debugging in Artanis.
>> And I imported r6rs define-record-type in server-context.scm
>> I guess there're some name conflicting.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 6:33 PM Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed 08 Jan 2020 15:22, Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > In unknown file:
>>> >            4 (primitive-load-path "artanis/server/server-context" #<…>)
>>> > In ice-9/eval.scm:
>>> >    626:19  3 (_ #<directory (artanis server server-context) 5624d6b3…>)
>>> >     155:9  2 (_ #<directory (artanis server server-context) 5624d6b3…>)
>>> > In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>> >   1153:19  1 (_ _ _ _ _ _ _)
>>> >   1655:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>>> >
>>> > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1655:16: In procedure raise-exception:
>>> > Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure 5624d66ee4a0 at
>>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1153:19 (a b c d e f)>
>>> >
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > Any hint that I can figure out whait's incompatible?
>>>
>>> Gosh we need to improve this info.  Anyway the procedure at
>>> boot-9.scm:1153:19 is a record constructor, for a record with 6 fields.
>>> Apparently somewhere in (artanis server server-context) is calling it
>>> with the wrong number of arguments.  What do you use for records?  Do
>>> you have your own abstraction or do you use R6RS records or something?
>>> Perhaps something in artanis relied on the way that R6RS records used to
>>> implement single inheritance, as a chain of objects instead of a flat
>>> record.  Or perhaps the adaptations to R6RS records in Guile introduced
>>> a bug.  I am interested to know the answer :)
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>