Re: Why does guile put -lgc into the linker flags?

[Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1807 bytes --]

Hello,

I think the issue is that the libguile.h file does not help downstream
packages isolate themselves from libgc completely. There are many static
functions related to bdwgc in gc-inline.h, which will be combined with
downstream code as a whole to compile, similar to using gc directly in your
code.

Best regards


On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 21:08 Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> this might be obvious to some, but I am curious why guile puts -lgc to
> the linker flags:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guile-config link
> -L/gnu/store/mfkz7fvlfpv3ppwbkv0imb19nrf95akf-guile-3.0.9/lib
> -L/gnu/store/pr73chdirm3jc2j7npc6hqzmcwjs7l8m-libgc-8.2.4/lib -lguile-3.0
> -lgc -lpthread -ldl
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Why is it necessary?  My guile extension interacts only with the
> libguile, no?  Even the GC-related functions are called via their scm_
> interface, I am never directly interacting with the Boehm GC.  I even
> thought that the fact that Boehm GC is used is an implementation detail,
> not an ABI thing.
>
> I would have thought that just libguile linking with the libgc is
> enough, but I am far from expert in this area.  So I would appreciate if
> someone could enlighten me.
>
> (I am not sure about the -lpthread and -ldl neither, but the -lgc is the
> one that caused me some problems, so I am asking about that one.)
>
> Thanks and have a nice day,
> Tomas
>
> PS: So once we switch to whippet, all extensions will need to be rebuilt
> due to linking against -lgc, which will no longer be Guile's dependency?
> So I guess .so version bump will be used for that?
>
> --
> There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
> cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2216 bytes --]