From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tristan Colgate Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Slow compile times on master Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:16:30 +0000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1130cc6274dadc051fd814e2 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442387811 9385 80.91.229.3 (16 Sep 2015 07:16:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:16:51 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 16 09:16:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zc6xV-00027Q-9Q for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:16:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zc6xU-0002jy-MI for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35583) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zc6xP-0002jb-32 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:16:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zc6xO-000505-6L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:33262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zc6xO-0004zy-0J for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so59083250wic.0 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:16:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=NjUimTeKN34L1W8BxQghKB/evCAj85mT6RF3b0+MrIQ=; b=PJY0tNFOrBMiCYRQiwpRRHaOyuDKEf1gP8CvPR33+RS/B5rkUtiHMpnAwrjQ/okkza L38n4YA336YzznjfcWAlQ9gYtn3sEr5PjNyjTktQoVl329+q+eWccNKYEMehLTv6/VOK zhvEJ6YDNZ5PvSzBBvsnG/OnXCV+bDh20rPqllkT38g0YPshLMSG8fd5/DCUVEZ4MOx4 rcszD9K0UXphmjWbYBlrIh29d8DrD+I+Agz5+cGCQlUo7CQVFL7KFRfYZET+rd5RWhrO gVks3rowFgJQF7j/2GLBo4jL6m4TzyPlLkwNrFSmLkEHKWDzH+2JCcniQ0AjIuRmPR/u yPFw== X-Received: by 10.194.105.73 with SMTP id gk9mr52624011wjb.122.1442387800151; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:16:40 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:17833 Archived-At: --001a1130cc6274dadc051fd814e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi All, I thought I'd see how things are looking on master (great to see work is still progressing toward 2.2). I just wanted to check that the compile times I've been seeing are to be expected. My (pretty weedy) laptop took over a day to build one it hit building the scms. guile-snmp took a good minute or so to build the code for the shell (it's really pretty tiny). Is this expected at the minute? or more likely to be a problem with cacheing. Anyway, thanks all for the great work on guile. guile-snmp pulls off some pretty gnarly tricks with dynamic symbol lookup and it's all kept on working since 1.8 without breaking,which is pretty darned cool. --001a1130cc6274dadc051fd814e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,
=C2=A0 I thought I'd see how things are lo= oking on master (great to see work is still progressing toward 2.2). I just= wanted to check that the compile times I've been seeing are to be expe= cted. My (pretty weedy) laptop took over a day to build one it hit building= the scms. guile-snmp took a good minute or so to build the code for the sh= ell (it's really pretty tiny).
=C2=A0 Is this expected at the= minute? or more likely to be a problem with cacheing.
=C2=A0 Any= way, thanks all for the great work on guile. guile-snmp pulls off some pret= ty gnarly tricks with dynamic symbol lookup and it's all kept on workin= g since 1.8 without breaking,which is pretty darned cool.
--001a1130cc6274dadc051fd814e2--