Mark, It turned out to be pretty easy to add it as a standalone test file (patch is attached). Chibi's (chibi test) and (chibi term ansi) just had to be copy and pasted into the top of the file, a few things added at the top to import the modules and enable the right read and print options, and a few modifications applied and it runs. Note that I enabled the r7rs-bytevectors reader and print options in the patch I submitted last night ( https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2017-06/msg00035.html ). Also note that the (test-exit) command I added at the end is commented out so that this test failing due to some failed tests doesn't stop all the non-standalone tests from running. Two tests have to be disabled which cause the script to break when they are reached, which are (test-write-syntax "|\"|" '|\"|) and (let () (define 7 1) (let-syntax () (define x 2) #f) (test 1 x)) Overall, the test results are pretty good. They are, as printed by the test-suite at the end, 1110 out of 1145 (96.9%) tests passed in 1.3156378269195557 seconds. 32 failures (2.8%). 3 errors (0.3%). 15 out of 18 (83.3%) subgroups passed. Weak areas are Strings, Read Syntax, and Numeric Syntax. Freja Nordsiek On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hi Freja, > > Freja Nordsiek writes: > > > On Mark Weaver's suggestion, I looked up the Kawa and Chibi R7RS-small > > test suites. Kawa uses Chibi's test-suite, though it is wrapped in a > > bit of extra code at the top. Kawa's license is not likely to be a > > problem, as it is a MIT license ( > > https://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/Software-License.html ). But, > > Chibi's license is a modified BSD license ( > > http://synthcode.com/license.txt ), which is compatible with the GPL ( > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ModifiedBSD ). > > Sounds good, thanks for checking it! > > > So, we could realistically take the Chibi test-suite (possibly with > > the Kawa modifications) and incorporate it into the r7rs-wip > > branch. The only question is whether to incorporate them as is or to > > modify them to use the same unit testing code as the rest of the unit > > tests in the guile test suite. > > I would prefer to use Chibi's test suite with minimal changes. I > suppose that we will need to add some code at the top, and it is > possible that we'll need to make some other modifications. > > Thanks! > Mark >