From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Shinn Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: syntax closures Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:45:23 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87ip6pv0jm.fsf@pobox.com> <87d2wxqikf.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5555590e48ed404d404d4b1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359017135 15453 80.91.229.3 (24 Jan 2013 08:45:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel To: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 24 09:45:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TyIRW-0004Ol-A1 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:45:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57309 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyIRE-0001jF-MX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:45:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyIR5-0001ix-Nj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:45:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyIR4-000400-Az for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:45:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:63641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyIR4-0003zM-28 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:45:26 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fj20so1649756lab.20 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:45:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=V8E/k5Eq1V97/fmuSt6YkVofmAcZEALXD/EU6hR7xt4=; b=0dLHtqPapcSKRXQm+wal+N/UzU/yle7GuvDU9qmwYUExrS86R+pRM7Crho8aN4ah9z bBHWyY7QACHcXm5x1RUugIJk6T7m7h8f6kdHWz2Iqq2u11DGw3816QUL+e6+woN/3IuE 5MLAONGuoCyIYCXKHRPywzRzcVj1QJ2YUntjKqw8ic3ZEJRmsGO0b8O99wD4jUSHaHYU JMMI/9znAGdNuOBKIlLoWa7H31Drl/vTxFeEjvEZ6cOXUbezzClk5Gu1uXWlkgucBhoP zHfup729KfNdUEtCIXTnKa5kYYlP//vcUvnnJ3pIntk274KDqGiOtfda0eA2Yy996Gfi 17BQ== X-Received: by 10.112.26.169 with SMTP id m9mr444376lbg.116.1359017123548; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:45:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.1.233 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:45:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.215.47 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15574 Archived-At: --bcaec5555590e48ed404d404d4b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.itampe@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2. I was actually hesistant to call this srfi-72 because of trying to > do what it want > more than what it say's. A main trick to simulate the effect was to > introduce > a closure in the syntax at one point and therefore a choose the name > syntax-closure not knowing that there is an already a notion of > that in the wild > Oh - I thought you were referring to the existing syntactic-closures. I guess it's a plausible enough name to reuse coincidentally... Carry on then :) -- Alex --bcaec5555590e48ed404d404d4b1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <= span dir=3D"ltr"><stefan.itampe@gmail.com> wrote:

2. I was actually hesistant to call this srfi-72 because of trying to
do what it want
=A0 =A0more than what it say's. A main trick to simulate the effect was= to introduce
=A0 =A0a closure in the syntax at one point and therefore a choose the name=
=A0 =A0syntax-closure not knowing that there is an already a notion of
that in the wild

Oh - I thought you wer= e referring to the existing syntactic-closures.
I guess it= 9;s a plausible enough name to reuse coincidentally...

Carry on then :)

--=A0
= Alex

--bcaec5555590e48ed404d404d4b1--