From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Shinn Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: syntax closures Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:08:44 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87ip6pv0jm.fsf@pobox.com> <87d2wxqikf.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec552428a62415304d3ff4a3d X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358993334 19361 80.91.229.3 (24 Jan 2013 02:08:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 02:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel To: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 24 03:09:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TyCFc-000370-7d for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:09:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35967 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyCFK-0007Sc-LX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:08:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyCFE-0007Q5-Kj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:08:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyCFC-000579-70 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:63058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyCFB-00055I-V6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:08:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m4so5461073lbo.14 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:08:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PuIRc0joqJ8RG6EGvKnzMns+JYie2gIcriQDQ7G5zoA=; b=ghujiSI3LKiLUM7EcDmXZw6Am0bzqmuGrTItTohzJ3ZVXTf3Up3wNvQLfz6iYzQ5zi XMQWvQ1yy/EqtFkKz7tuCdKR7X0QjID80a0SVTcOe/sWyOzE/epkOcEyPzb33j2Ghnh4 msf8BObB2i2sJ03s8+hTAImajxElXvPguSXQk5fbqEoKzfIMnyavjq6oo4AQeJOQQOwF ax7PG6CSq1Go9s7Q1qKcZBDB5WLt6IYrWpOTDUoqzaSZ6PtyPzJhp56DsF6/X7r1pH9q plTaO7ut3VDTqpoP47Y1mowXSndgGHgFWG/us6FHsw6OsGUv3iBFIabu6eK6rv/eLAhp K2Wg== X-Received: by 10.112.25.100 with SMTP id b4mr125013lbg.37.1358993324916; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:08:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.1.233 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:08:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.169 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15571 Archived-At: --bcaec552428a62415304d3ff4a3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.itampe@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I managed to do what you said, the result is at > > https://gitorious.org/syntax-closures > > I changed it so that it is enough to do > > (use-modules (srfi srfi-72)) > Note SRFI-72 is not an implementation of syntactic-closures. It's an alternate hygiene algorithm closer to the R6RS one which includes a compatible syntax-case and some convenience utilities. Syntactic-closures never had a formal specification, just an informal description and reference implementation, so it's not clear to me if SRFI-72's make-capturing-identifier is equivalent to the synclos free variables. -- Alex --bcaec552428a62415304d3ff4a3d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <= span dir=3D"ltr"><stefan.itampe@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I managed to do what you said, the result is at

https:/= /gitorious.org/syntax-closures

I changed it so that it is enough to do

(use-modules (srfi srfi-72))

Note= SRFI-72 is not an implementation of syntactic-closures.
It= 's an alternate hygiene algorithm closer to the R6RS one which
includes a compatible syntax-case and some convenience utilities= .

Syntactic-closures never had a forma= l specification, just
an informal description and reference= implementation, so
it's not clear to me if SRFI-72's make-capturing-identif= ier is
equivalent to the synclos free variables.

--=A0
Alex

--bcaec552428a62415304d3ff4a3d--