From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Thompson, David" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Test for weak pairs in hash-for-each Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:41:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87vbvotjr3.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87vbvkw4p8.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <878usf9apy.fsf@yeeloong.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394631708 15552 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2014 13:41:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 14:41:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WNjPv-0000ay-3t for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:41:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60672 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNjPu-0004pv-NL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:41:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNjPj-0004po-UY for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNjPe-0001oW-EX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:41:43 -0400 Original-Received: from na3sys009aog118.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.244]:53587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNjPe-0001nC-7i for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:41:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob118.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUyBkDby+rEOSUQ38LuR65OMhT8892eam@postini.com; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:41:38 PDT Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p10so1088475pdj.17 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:41:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=d5+aoD4S4zXWseaVDrb6+EmKFuLEShfU5IfZXtgYlAI=; b=LqZDxny9RPrjNGFB8P2H46Pyi22a4W5AeTD5zW+9d3sP/3T19Qm0vrYgJ3BMwrdqVk nmKzx2mNuVQ2SSyhnRlnDPaAgZKo2rL7t7w8M21yXLIfGLhQ7umVjfeuuB856vdU22CL bHbWckYiOrE0lUykL3480ITMLljKAqjh4l8OW+ANup1Vi/vVLTgCTuGlfD9jlSl1uxEI BFvUpGl10LffwovHSR2dTA72g/cZWXm2lf+02WnXbTV9xU2LnNmmAiRvYDrIg0+vf8Zs 0tcuFd3NBgigFNgFYX4oDlPVmL2fAgdfn/U//yMO6714g12er346oXmSYRAnaoMSi+Zk wE0g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlxcwFqyAjyhniJwRbEACIypTAfy6R0ghDtLOkpJJVldxd2gipxVA/WBAZsYbgevY4juS//vedlRA1UNF/tbZGhgUkBe+wB6uw5EUGMGPriEaZlGo4MQ/yS4XE2ztp6zyNndp2qgaL+VPuDnCIs825cp8dhiA== X-Received: by 10.68.171.193 with SMTP id aw1mr5094546pbc.117.1394631692814; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:41:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.171.193 with SMTP id aw1mr5094536pbc.117.1394631692704; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.70.100.105 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:41:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878usf9apy.fsf@yeeloong.lan> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-Received-From: 74.125.149.244 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16965 Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > David Thompson writes: > >> * libguile/hashtab.c (hash-for-each): Test for deleted weak pairs. > > Instead of (hash-for-each), it should be > (scm_internal_hash_for_each_handle). > > I went ahead and pushed it, with that change. > > Thanks! > Mark Ah, sorry. I always mess up something like that. Thanks for taking care of it. - Dave