From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Thompson, David" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add procedures to convert alists into hash tables Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:19:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5263E55A.6040307@worcester.edu> <87txg0p805.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383164372 5426 80.91.229.3 (30 Oct 2013 20:19:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 21:19:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbcEp-0003Q6-7s for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:19:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54264 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbcEo-0006LN-R7 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbcEg-0006KF-TU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbcEZ-00008F-L6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:19:26 -0400 Original-Received: from na3sys009aog135.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.84]:58549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbcEZ-00006U-EM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:19:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob135.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUnFpxZzJGETN0BRCcpseTflZrWf8ze+L@postini.com; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:19:19 PDT Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kx10so1490967pab.12 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:19:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hlZ7wAwmVTmsBE3uWXaeG7n2nCYHrnppeqnyIkZlGBQ=; b=dyo521mZfUyDxihyRCamomMxZV8rE2KTdCdX6TrW1Gjcjfvsex4mEZEdBNO6frYZQA BiqbXO9xAsr6LYKRS38yW473OVQ7mWe4FNzu27gNToquRAWBsFPX70POCKtSOte7JiC+ f8cRH2OE0o1uaI3R/6Ch+/pq6OiJX/wdl4mzxvZQY1nftZUnCOEG79fJNhQ6CHm6QzN6 upPkMgOs9MNBC8tnDRoPKDsv+ZCRdczgwrezi5S4GcdN1xk7fefn32NdKraKx6TFhDR6 OlDWFY67nnvpCssZ2KqfkwAAvJcyDbz17dAXCsP8ep8GFcjpus/ZSzWGD6IF1jDrLVBr e4Hg== X-Received: by 10.66.141.199 with SMTP id rq7mr233450pab.9.1383164356555; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:19:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUO74hVOv0GMNo8UWDhTMm53W8kW7XtPU8O6MZb3eRZgsXBC1Oip+3QBIB0DY+3KPTw9V0DSKa6MC83pS5S2CPOBjMWaIoK0vi0YLXPmnwztoheiEwlN1kEkC4B9W7iXg8mT48CfNDF49FQdCNDh9/Gz0Hxg== X-Received: by 10.66.141.199 with SMTP id rq7mr233431pab.9.1383164356289; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.70.45.167 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:19:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87txg0p805.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-Received-From: 74.125.149.84 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16704 Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > I think it would make sense to implement them in Scheme, say in > ice-9/hash-table.scm, which could be either a separate module or a file > included from boot-9.scm. > > WDYT? Does anyone else feel that this is a better approach? My patch has already gone through a few revisions, but I suppose I can rewrite it again. - Dave