​​

And I still find it difficult to see anything terrible in the idea that "FSF had been subverted", when I interpret that in terms of software security, because the way I see it, the main premise of FSF movement is to share the code (as opposed to restricting it), and the main goal of the GNU Operating System is to propagate that idea, rather than to provide a secure and reliable operating system (which are only secondary goals that are needed to be fulfilled in order for the operating system to become popular, respected and desired -- or to advertise the idea well enough).