From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: lua branch Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:42:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87fvzipxn7.fsf@Kagami.home> <87r4if6czh.fsf@Kagami.home> <87zjwwkb4z.fsf@Kagami.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369184880 10710 80.91.229.3 (22 May 2013 01:08:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 01:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ian Price Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 22 03:07:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UexX5-0006va-1j for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 03:07:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UexX4-0001vz-Im for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 21:07:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UetO0-00044J-4Q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 16:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UetNr-0005yX-DN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 16:42:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:37863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UetNr-0005yI-65 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 16:42:11 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p10so1314819lbi.17 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6Ff9OcghvWTrwFWDeNQSgMf2KKj1s0AQCEN8lKiHIL8=; b=zZcGjewRQyUZqZXKGYlZXhWdt7Q00wgoaOPmJN10OLKaPiF38ioGKY1p0xFXi9Aavp QtWhrQcgfO08I5yiIysEpT5OLEXTiy/HkKxG/EpQVyBnN/886AYLAN2QDT0KJC6FRhkY Kc566C6KKb+T/YJtzAFGxDGfdG9DQnEJuBqdzsaNL+atwCwHKdK1B3bB9fwmmY/P4PGy uBjquOWjNoxOyeFszhuKdiA3BRN6xaHfJaHCQ3a9e+bMpLBOavS4yIESoEfhQW9NqWBT yo2Ub7nENIzSEut3SXvEfU1BVMdHgmgzX/8xP6drXYlNdNbbVE5yIj773WkmsZ57S7Zi XIBQ== X-Received: by 10.112.185.67 with SMTP id fa3mr2432652lbc.118.1369168929581; Tue, 21 May 2013 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.112.135.71 with HTTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zjwwkb4z.fsf@Kagami.home> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.172 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:07:57 -0400 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16402 Archived-At: Hey guys, I was just thinking about Guile Lua (and feeling guilty that I never did finish it). Anyway, I never did make any progress after my 2012 posts. I got a little discouraged while implementing Lua's multiple values everywhere, to be honest. By all means, feel free to take over the lua branch. As long as it's okay with Ludo, Andy, whoever is in charge these days, I think you should push to it with reckless abandon instead of submitting patches since it isn't used in guile (yet). On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Ian Price wrote: > Ian Price writes: > >> The current issues with lua vs master are as follows >> 1) has been renamed to on master >> 2) has been replaced with which is not quite a drop-in >> 3) while was being compiled into something with improper scoping. >> >> I have fixes for these locally. There is just the question of rebase vs >> merge for bringing the branch up to date. Any preference there? > > Sorry, got distracted. > Is it okay to merge master into lua, and push these three patches? > > -- > Ian Price -- shift-reset.com > > "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is > the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled" >