From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: syntax closures Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:34:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ip6pv0jm.fsf@pobox.com> <87d2wxqikf.fsf@pobox.com> <87sj4y1ab1.fsf@tines.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360920911 12801 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2013 09:35:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 10:35:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U6HhX-0001AA-7x for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:35:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42941 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6HhA-00078G-Mw for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Hh5-00077b-8l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:35:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Hgz-000497-6L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:34:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:59235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Hgz-000490-24 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:34:53 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id fw7so2062000vcb.6 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:34:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Kocv0OGHkeB1j9de26tCIDRjzIFJ6kL1PwvbhvXRGTM=; b=m5tV2rapIm+0K22mEiO+mKZ9Ps1ApfFKUPVuFsYaVnIawuD/t1nCALMHfRO5IYXh0y M0U1gebBC0Y8FL9CHLT3UiVazRUPXBxiKLC/oYEDSr4wHnL/jRxrcXFpAgl0JcgFgjZp ZvuByplxYyGYxS4oaBZYwi7w/DekBfzfA/nSyvAaFaHODRwzyT5RFod0gZo1u2ZL7/aM okkoDCpNFMNLH1rnVpyrnTdYiZRpJG7jqhbRhBZ1h5s7wbgvPbAciRj2ZmPip8o2g8yx mQHEo/KbiCJVVQJfMnvxvlRKCpDgPtYN0WU7hrn7BUfA63Q4otyzLm/vUN1aVUybjtzO Ex5w== X-Received: by 10.58.198.79 with SMTP id ja15mr2373689vec.15.1360920892207; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:34:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.58.155.38 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:34:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87sj4y1ab1.fsf@tines.lan> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.175 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15745 Archived-At: How about h-quasisyntax for hygienic quasisyntax ? On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes: >> Let's call it guile-srfi-72, In the end it is a srfi-72 simulator [...] > > I'm pretty sure this is also false. One of the main points of SRFI-72 > is the improved hygiene algorithm, which is quite different than psyntax > in its details. Unless I'm mistaken, you have picked out only one small > aspect of SRFI-72 that happens to be relevant to what you're doing. > > Therefore, I don't think it should be called SRFI-72 either. > > Mark