Re: rackets syntax parse

[Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.itampe@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]

OK,

I have skiped the usage of structs to store data and just use clever lists
with similar api
as the structs so that syntax information can be pushed down to it. With
this I get a lot of
things working again and the codebase is much cleaner. I no longer do uggly
hack with
the syntax representation. The only caveat is some usage of
syntax-local-binding.

Regards
Stefan

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Wed 25 Jan 2012 21:37, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.itampe@gmail.com>
> writes:
>
> > I got it working with an old version of guile but have problem with
> newest
> > stable-2.0
>
> What version did you get it working with?  In a year there have only
> been 25 commits to psyntax, and none of them should have changed
> anything fundamental.
>
> > Again the main issue is that guile psyntax does not support the #s
> notation in racket and hence the
> > hacks on the syntax objects. (see the series of emails that I send
> previous week)
>
> I'll look again.
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1574 bytes --]