Re: GNU Guile 2.9.8 Released [beta]

[Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.itampe@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1605 bytes --]

I can confirm that this patch solves the issue

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:33 AM Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Wed 08 Jan 2020 15:22, Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > In unknown file:
> >            4 (primitive-load-path "artanis/server/server-context" #<…>)
> > In ice-9/eval.scm:
> >    626:19  3 (_ #<directory (artanis server server-context) 5624d6b3…>)
> >     155:9  2 (_ #<directory (artanis server server-context) 5624d6b3…>)
> > In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> >   1153:19  1 (_ _ _ _ _ _ _)
> >   1655:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> >
> > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1655:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> > Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure 5624d66ee4a0 at
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1153:19 (a b c d e f)>
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Any hint that I can figure out whait's incompatible?
>
> Gosh we need to improve this info.  Anyway the procedure at
> boot-9.scm:1153:19 is a record constructor, for a record with 6 fields.
> Apparently somewhere in (artanis server server-context) is calling it
> with the wrong number of arguments.  What do you use for records?  Do
> you have your own abstraction or do you use R6RS records or something?
> Perhaps something in artanis relied on the way that R6RS records used to
> implement single inheritance, as a chain of objects instead of a flat
> record.  Or perhaps the adaptations to R6RS records in Guile introduced
> a bug.  I am interested to know the answer :)
>
> Andy
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2097 bytes --]