Hi,

To note is that in order to implement common lisp one need to bypass tree-il
and generate directly to glil, the reason is that tagbody is poorly
represented
by tree-il. If we intend to be multilingual it would be nice to be able to
effectively
represent those ideoms. Any thoughts on it?

/Stefan


On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ian Price <ianprice90@googlemail.com>wrote:

> Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> What about common lisp is scheme a lisp or is CL a scheme :-)
> >>
> >
> > IIRC， someone raised the topic that emerge Clisp into Guile in 2011,
> > but what's the status now?
> >
> >> Anyway to support CL I would think that we need to support placing
> >> properties
> >> on symbols, e,g. currently a symbol slot is a variable, but to
> >> effectively support CL I would go for
> >> /Stefan
>
> I don't think we should get ahead of ourselves, but emacs has had some
> minor CL emulation in things like cl.el and cl-lib. I think these could
> be good test cases for the elisp support.
>
> --
> Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
>
> "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
> the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
>