*Note

Em qui, 17 de jan de 2019 às 19:13, Jéssica Milaré <jessymilare@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Done.
>
> Not that there are many commits. The first commit only fixes bug 33827 of
> SRFI 69, and SRFI 69 is reimplemented in the third commit, which pretty
> much erases the changes of the first commit.
>
> https://github.com/jessymilare/guile/pull/1
>
> Em qua, 16 de jan de 2019 às 22:19, Amirouche Boubekki <
> amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> I will try to look at the commits. One last niptick, can you push guile
>> master branch to you repository, and make a pull request against it so that
>> I can directly comment in the pull requests. please. It's easier to way to
>> see the overall changes in particular.
>>
>> Le dim. 13 janv. 2019 à 23:52, Jéssica Milaré <jessymilare@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Finally finished the libraries.
>>>
>>> SRFI-125 is implemented. I took the liberty to create a procedure
>>> scm_hash_n_items in 'libguile/hashtab.c' that works with both normal and
>>> weak hash tables, so the GENERIC-HASH-TABLES module don't need to keep
>>> track of the hash table size anymore.
>>>
>>> `make check` runs everything ok. I believe it's ready for testing. Any
>>> feedback is welcome.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jéssica
>>>
>>> Em sáb, 12 de jan de 2019 às 18:34, Jéssica Milaré <
>>> jessymilare@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> (It seems I mistakenly responded only to a personal e-mail, sorry,
>>>> responded now to everyone in the list with updates).
>>>>
>>>> So here are the news:
>>>>
>>>> I've created a module called (ice-9 generic-hash-tables), which is
>>>> similar to SRFI-125, and used it to implement SRFI-69, (RNRS HASHTABLES),
>>>> SRFI-126 and SRFI-125. Since SRFI-125 depends on SRFI-128, I've implemented
>>>> it as well. My public repository already has SRFI-128, I'm just finishing
>>>> some tests with SRFI-125 and, once they are done, I'll push it as well.
>>>>
>>>> The module (ice-9 generic-hash-tables), is quite usable and all
>>>> exported procedures are documented. I've created tests for it and also
>>>> ported standard tests from SRFI-126.
>>>>
>>>> Now, I see that 'libguile/hashtab.h' code keeps track of the number of
>>>> elements in hash tables, but the field is not visible from Scheme. Can that
>>>> be changed? Then generic hash tables wouldn't need to also keep track of
>>>> the number of elements (like SRFI-69 currently does) and that would
>>>> simplify its code.
>>>>
>>>> Besides, what about creating new versions HASHX-* procedures that
>>>> accept an equivalence procedure instead of an assoc procedure? Perhaps
>>>> prefixed by 'NEW-' or post-fixed by a '*'.
>>>>
>>>> I've also found inconsistencies between SRFI-125 and it's reference
>>>> implementation and standard tests. I've implemented according to the
>>>> specification - so, for instance, HASH-TABLE=? checks if the equivalence
>>>> function of both hash tables are the same and HASH-TABLE returns an
>>>> immutable hash table.
>>>>
>>>> Code is public and suggestions are always welcome :)
>>>> https://github.com/jessymilare/guile
>>>>
>>>> Regargs,
>>>> Jéssica
>>>>
>>>> Em dom, 30 de dez de 2018 às 15:50, Amirouche Boubekki <
>>>> amirouche@hypermove.net> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> Le 2018-12-28 17:11, Jéssica Milaré a écrit :
>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > As I said in a previous e-mail, currently SRFI-69 is broken for weak
>>>>> > hash tables - and I've sent a patch to fix it. However, I think there
>>>>> > are many other problems with current implementation of hash tables.
>>>>> > There are guile standard hash tables, SRFI-69 hash tables (which is
>>>>> > implemented on top of standard hash tables) and also R6RS hash tables
>>>>> > (which is implemented on top or SRFI-69 and completely lacks support
>>>>> > for weak keys and/or values).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I think that should be fixed and guile should have only two kinds of
>>>>> > hash tables: the standard guile hash table and another extended hash
>>>>> > table type that will be used directly by R6RS, SRFI-125 and SRFI-69.
>>>>> > In my opinion, it should be based on SRFI-125, which is part of R7RS
>>>>> > Red Edition, but also supports some other procedures to make it
>>>>> > compatible with R6RS and SRFI-69, supporting weakness and immutable
>>>>> > hash tables.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'm already implementing the SRFI-125 based hash tables library for
>>>>> > myself, so, if that is accepted, I can also make a patch for guile.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes please make a patch and attach it to the bug report.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't forget to send an announcement when you SRFI-125 implementation
>>>>> is ready for testing. Is it already available anywhere?
>>>>>
>>>>> TIA
>>>>>
>>>>