From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gnu.guix.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Resurrecting top-notch continuous integration for Guile Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:34:40 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87lell2qgc.fsf@inria.fr> Reply-To: Felix Lechner Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29724"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 19:36:05 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCX7-0007TH-8v for gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:36:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCWg-00047N-1T; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCWY-00046Q-Lf; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCWW-0007b8-AI; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:35:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=kGnwDWmVyIq7S+f Zu8l80t6AW6f+D2JmYwlJxXzgKcw=; h=cc:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to: references; d=lease-up.com; b=D1uMzl8IPKi8Z8VOHhEFwHS1RiIdTq6eppfBOTRC chOa+CWraLGDo6WLm2lgaPzSkUfErYe8zGVGlqkg3aHTGwStBvZQz1fZ/c3n4EHYlzMWy6 c8et+mey2PNmEpoiLuwrhFY2hdMFtXGpwETohNrqR8WeVuEzlg1VxVJrJzdfI= Original-Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 90212276 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Sun, 29 Jan 2023 18:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f41.google.com with SMTP id v17so10099189lfd.7; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:35:18 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqilx+4nz3HKnksgtqHnwwXI3xiyehKvAomj+fhrdXX9uaaFoD3 TY+O2a7wPCNIqJvi72P1fg5D7VwTIyAXAtInddc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXumZb9n0G2kFIyqpBcf8+OiLPQOoG0h9M/wAhj3wz0oei/s3GlC1IwZHRi40Ajje1esyJsVuZt6czCsZ/HUBZ0= X-Received: by 2002:a19:551a:0:b0:4b5:9be4:ed56 with SMTP id n26-20020a19551a000000b004b59be4ed56mr2953493lfe.19.1675017316795; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:35:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lell2qgc.fsf@inria.fr> X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=208.82.101.137; envelope-from=felix.lechner@lease-up.com; helo=sail-ipv4.us-core.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.comp.gnu.guix.devel:65218 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:21660 Archived-At: Hi Ludo' On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 9:37 AM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > I hereby ask fellow Guix hackers to voice any > concerns they may have regarding this use of project resources. I am not a Guix hacker (although maybe every user is one too) and, as a newbie, I cannot speak for the group but the Guix project is built on Guile and depends on Guile functioning properly. I cannot imagine any opposition whatsoever. The way I see it, Guixers are more likely to celebrate your proposal as a welcome milestone in the continuous evolution of Guix and Nix. > If there are no objections, I=E2=80=99ll merge this > branch into =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. As it stands, Guix owes a profound debt of gratitude to Guile and its developers. There is no reason to wait. Thank you for your expert stewardship in designing the OS we all love so mu= ch! Kind regards Felix