From: Damien Mattei <damien.mattei@gmail.com>
To: William ML Leslie <william.leslie.ttg@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean-Paul Roy <jean-paul.roy@unice.fr>,
guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: new function
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:40:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADEOadeCDf+XFrG2jk4HYXaa-2c0x5-DNtskV_s42Pt1Btt=Ww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHgd1hGM68sS+XJLqJYccVAxMZZYyHG=oSCyd1RzmasYcz6NAQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2435 bytes --]
interesting discussion about "scope",
note i'm not saying i want Scheme+ act as Python, i'm still thinking the
best solution...
to be sure about terminology i find this good article about scoping:
https://medium.com/altcampus/scope-local-global-and-lexical-e164f53450b3
Damien
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:52 PM William ML Leslie <
william.leslie.ttg@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, 4:51 am Taylan Kammer, <taylan.kammer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 22.09.2021 11:53, Damien Mattei wrote:
>> > i already do it this way for internal defines ,using a recursive macro
>> that build a list of variable using an accumulator. It can works but macro
>> expansion seems slow, it was not immediate at compilation on a little
>> example (oh nothing more that 2 seconds) but i'm not sure it is easily
>> maintainable, it is at the limit what macro can do i think ,for speed
>> reasons. In fact i can not really understand in Guile as it is based on C
>> and compiled when macro expansion happens,what is the time cost... so for
>> all those ,perhaps not objective reason ,i prefer to avoid.
>>
>> I don't think there's any other way to achieve what you want, especially
>> using portable Scheme code. The lexical scoping semantics of Scheme are
>> a very fundamental part of the language, and cannot be worked around in
>> portable Scheme code without using a macro that rewrites whole bodies of
>> lambda expressions.
>>
>> Even using implementation-specific hacks, you won't get very far. Any
>> compiled Scheme implementation, and even most interpreted ones, won't
>> allow you to modify an outer scope's set of variable definitions from
>> within an inner scope.
>>
>> So if you really want to have Python's scoping semantics in Scheme, you
>> will probably have to write a complex 'def' macro that walks through the
>> body and "hoists" variable definitions to the outermost scope.
>>
>
> Python is lexically scoped, and the assignment here is supposed to be
> local.
>
>
>> If you're targeting R6RS implementations, you can use syntax-case to
>> write such a macro, but it won't be easy.
>>
>> If you're targeting R5RS or R7RS-small implementations, you will have to
>> rely on syntax-rules, which will probably be extremely difficult for this
>> kind of complex macro.
>>
>> Personally I don't even know how I would approach the problem using the
>> more capable syntax-case, let alone pure syntax-rules.
>>
>> --
>> Taylan
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3780 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-19 7:54 new function Damien Mattei
2021-09-19 14:41 ` Matt Wette
2021-09-19 14:43 ` Matt Wette
2021-09-19 21:38 ` Taylan Kammer
2021-09-21 12:26 ` Damien Mattei
2021-09-22 8:44 ` Damien Mattei
2021-09-22 9:06 ` William ML Leslie
2021-09-22 9:53 ` Damien Mattei
2021-09-22 18:51 ` Taylan Kammer
2021-09-22 21:52 ` William ML Leslie
2021-09-23 8:40 ` Damien Mattei [this message]
2021-09-23 19:03 ` Taylan Kammer
2021-09-23 17:27 ` Damien Mattei
2021-09-23 18:00 ` Maxime Devos
2021-09-23 20:27 ` Taylan Kammer
2021-09-23 20:42 ` Damien Mattei
2021-09-23 20:48 ` Taylan Kammer
2021-09-23 21:53 ` Damien Mattei
2021-09-24 4:41 ` Damien Mattei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADEOadeCDf+XFrG2jk4HYXaa-2c0x5-DNtskV_s42Pt1Btt=Ww@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=damien.mattei@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jean-paul.roy@unice.fr \
--cc=william.leslie.ttg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).