Note that 121 is withdrawn, so people should implement 158.

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 1:38 AM Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:

> Hi Arthur,
>
> "Arthur A. Gleckler" <srfi@speechcode.com> writes:
> > It's not a bad idea for the sample implementation to be as clear as
> > possible at the expense of performance.
>
> I agree that it's desirable for one of the sample implementations to be
> as simple and clear as possible, for the purpose of clarifying the
> specification.
>
> > But it certainly wouldn't hurt to have a supplemental document making
> > recommendations about possible performance improvements, or even a
> > second implementation.
>
> Sounds good.  For SRFIs such as 121 and 158, where efficiency is
> important, I think that a second sample implementation tuned for
> performance would be a useful addition.
>
>      Regards,
>        Mark
>