Hi Janneke,

That was elegant. :-)

Nope---haven't seen it. (Or, at least I do not remember it.)

Maybe I should have a look at what the optimizer can do about Mark's code. (As you might have seen, my code is a modification of the method syntax implementation itself.)

Any opinions on what is best: Having a define-method* or having the functionality in define-method itself?

Best regards,

Mikael

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:00 PM <janneke@gnu.org> wrote:

Mikael Djurfeldt writes:

Hi Mikael,

> Since there are no comments, I'm inclined to apply this patch. I will do
> that on Sunday if there are no comments before that.

Just FYI, have you seen the attached patch by Mark Weaver? I've been
carrying that for some time now, functionality like this is very
welcome.

Greetings,
Janneke

--
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com