On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 3:22 PM David Pirotte <david@altosw.be> wrote:

> Hi Aleix,
>
>         i decided to answer separately - and  change the subject line -
>         (a) the guile-cairo related issue, on homebrew, from the
>

Just to be clear, there's no issue with guile-cairo I believe. The segfault
with guile-cairo was when using Guile's upstream.


>         (b) snapshot related issue, on homebrew as well
>
>         here is the 'subthread' for the guile-cairo related issue, on
>         homebrew [1].
>
> > > > Anyways, guile-cairo is fine going back to stable 3.0.9.
>
> > > Ok, so just to make sure, now both the gtk4/simple-paintable.scm and
> > > gtk4/animated-paintable.scm examples work fine on 'your' platform as
> > > well?
>
> > Nope, they don't. Sorry, I should have been much more explicit and
> > provide more info.
>
> Ok - These are two examples ported from the upstream gtk4-demo, can you
> run one or both of these examples? [screenshot attached of the upstream
> gt4-demo ui (on debian trixie (current testing)).
>
> If they don't work, please report upstream, if they do work, try to get
> a backtrace as well, for the simple-animation.scm example only, let's
> try to identify the problem for the simplest one ...
>
>
Ah nice, I didn't know that. They work well, see screenshot. The animated
one is the same but rotating the nuclear icon.

This is a good clue though, at least we know where not to look.

Aleix